Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 892
Filtrar
2.
Healthc Manage Forum ; 35(5): 310-317, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35830436

RESUMO

Enhancing the use of technology in long-term care has been identified as a key part of broader efforts to strengthen the sector in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. To inform such efforts, we convened a series of citizen panels, followed by a national stakeholder dialogue with system leaders focused on reimagining the long-term care sector using technology. Key actions prioritized through the deliberations convened included: developing an innovation roadmap/agenda (including national standards and guidelines); using co-design approaches for the strengthening the long-term care sector and for technological innovation; identifying and coordinating existing innovation projects to support scale and spread; enabling rapid-learning and improvement cycles to support the development, evaluation, and implementation of new technologies; and using funding models that enable the flexibility needed for such rapid-learning cycles.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Participação dos Interessados , Tecnologia/métodos , Canadá , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Pandemias , Tecnologia/tendências
3.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0262264, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35108291

RESUMO

We estimated excess mortality in Medicare recipients in the United States with probable and confirmed Covid-19 infections in the general community and amongst residents of long-term care (LTC) facilities. We considered 28,389,098 Medicare and dual-eligible recipients from one year before February 29, 2020 through September 30, 2020, with mortality followed through November 30th, 2020. Probable and confirmed Covid-19 diagnoses, presumably mostly symptomatic, were determined from ICD-10 codes. We developed a Risk Stratification Index (RSI) mortality model which was applied prospectively to establish baseline mortality risk. Excess deaths attributable to Covid-19 were estimated by comparing actual-to-expected deaths based on historical (2017-2019) comparisons and in closely matched concurrent (2020) cohorts with and without Covid-19. Overall, 677,100 (2.4%) beneficiaries had confirmed Covid-19 and 2,917,604 (10.3%) had probable Covid-19. A total of 472,329 confirmed cases were community living and 204,771 were in LTC. Mortality following a probable or confirmed diagnosis in the community increased from an expected incidence of about 4.0% to actual incidence of 7.5%. In long-term care facilities, the corresponding increase was from 20.3% to 24.6%. The absolute increase was therefore similar at 3-4% in the community and in LTC residents. The percentage increase was far greater in the community (89.5%) than among patients in chronic care facilities (21.1%) who had higher baseline risk of mortality. The LTC population without probable or confirmed Covid-19 diagnoses experienced 38,932 excess deaths (34.8%) compared to historical estimates. Limitations in access to Covid-19 testing and disease under-reporting in LTC patients probably were important factors, although social isolation and disruption in usual care presumably also contributed. Remarkably, there were 31,360 (5.4%) fewer deaths than expected in community dwellers without probable or confirmed Covid-19 diagnoses. Disruptions to the healthcare system and avoided medical care were thus apparently offset by other factors, representing overall benefit. The Covid-19 pandemic had marked effects on mortality, but the effects were highly context-dependent.


Assuntos
COVID-19/mortalidade , Medicare/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Benefícios do Seguro/tendências , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Masculino , Mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/tendências , Estados Unidos
4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 69(10): 2766-2777, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34549415

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken a disproportionate toll on long-term care facility residents and staff. Our objective was to review the empirical evidence on facility characteristics associated with COVID-19 cases and deaths. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: Long-term care facilities (nursing homes and assisted living communities). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six empirical studies of factors associated with COVID-19 cases and deaths in long-term care facilities published between January 1, 2020 and June 15, 2021. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes included the probability of at least one case or death (or other defined threshold); numbers of cases and deaths, measured variably. RESULTS: Larger, more rigorous studies were fairly consistent in their assessment of risk factors for COVID-19 outcomes in long-term care facilities. Larger bed size and location in an area with high COVID-19 prevalence were the strongest and most consistent predictors of facilities having more COVID-19 cases and deaths. Outcomes varied by facility racial composition, differences that were partially explained by facility size and community COVID-19 prevalence. More staff members were associated with a higher probability of any outbreak; however, in facilities with known cases, higher staffing was associated with fewer deaths. Other characteristics, such as Nursing Home Compare 5-star ratings, ownership, and prior infection control citations, did not have consistent associations with COVID-19 outcomes. CONCLUSION: Given the importance of community COVID-19 prevalence and facility size, studies that failed to control for these factors were likely confounded. Better control of community COVID-19 spread would have been critical for mitigating much of the morbidity and mortality long-term care residents and staff experienced during the pandemic. Traditional quality measures such as Nursing Home Compare 5-Star ratings and past deficiencies were not consistent indicators of pandemic preparedness, likely because COVID-19 presented a novel problem requiring extensive adaptation by both long-term care providers and policymakers.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/organização & administração , Assistência de Longa Duração , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Risco Ajustado , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Idoso , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Defesa Civil/organização & administração , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Neurology ; 96(16): e2037-e2047, 2021 04 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33970881

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine contemporary trends in case fatality, discharge destination, and admission to long-term care after acute ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) using a large, population-based cohort. METHODS: We used linked administrative data to identify all emergency department visits and hospital admissions for first-ever ischemic stroke or ICH in Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2017. We calculated crude and age-/sex-standardized risk of death at 30 days and 1 year from stroke onset. We stratified crude trends by stroke type, age, and sex and used the Kendall τ-b correlation coefficient to evaluate the significance of trends. We determined trends in discharge home and to rehabilitation and admission to long-term care at 1 year. We used Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models to assess whether trends in outcomes persisted after adjustment for baseline factors, estimated stroke severity, and use of life-sustaining care. RESULTS: There were 163,574 people with acute ischemic stroke or ICH across the study period. Between 2003 and 2017, age-/sex-standardized 30-day stroke case fatality decreased from 20.5% to 13.2% (7.3% absolute and 36% relative reduction) while that at 1 year decreased from 32.2% to 22.8% (9.3% absolute and 29% relative reduction). Findings were consistent across age, sex, and stroke type, and after adjustment for comorbid conditions, stroke severity, and use of life-sustaining care. There was a reduction in long-term care admission after ischemic stroke and an increase in discharge home or to rehabilitation for both stroke types. CONCLUSION: We observed substantial reductions in acute stroke case fatality from 2003 to 2017 with a concurrent increase in discharge to home or rehabilitation and a decrease in long-term care admissions, suggesting continuous improvements in stroke systems of care.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia
7.
J R Coll Physicians Edinb ; 51(1): 85-90, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33877145

RESUMO

Telemedicine use has expanded rapidly to cope with increasing demand on services by delivering remote clinical review and monitoring of long-term conditions. Triaging individual patients to determine their suitability for telephone, video or face-to-face consultations is necessary. This is crucial in the context of COVID-19 to ensure doctor-patient safety. Telemedicine was shown to be safe and feasible in managing certain chronic diseases and providing patient education. When reviewing newly referred or long-term patients, different specialty clinics have different requirements for physical examination. Clinicians prefer face-to-face consultations at the initial visit to establish a doctor-patient relationship; telephone or video consultations are reasonable options for long-term patients where physical examination may not be needed. Video consultations, often aided by sophisticated devices and apps or medical assistants, are useful to facilitate remote physical examination. Most patients prefer telemedicine as it saves time and travel cost and provides better access to appointments.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , COVID-19 , Doença Crônica/terapia , Exame Físico/métodos , Consulta Remota , Telemedicina , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Previsões , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Relações Médico-Paciente , Consulta Remota/métodos , Consulta Remota/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/normas
8.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 80(4): 1395-1399, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33646169

RESUMO

The rapid emergence of COVID-19 has had far-reaching effects across all sectors of health and social care, but none more so than for residential long-term care homes. Mortality rates of older people with dementia in residential long-term care homes have been exponentially higher than the general public. Morbidity rates are also higher in these homes with the effects of government-imposed COVID-19 public health directives (e.g., strict social distancing), which have led most residential long-term care homes to adopt strict 'no visitor' and lockdown policies out of concern for their residents' physical safety. This tragic toll of the COVID-19 pandemic highlights profound stigma-related inequities. Societal assumptions that people living with dementia have no purpose or meaning and perpetuate a deep pernicious fear of, and disregard for, persons with dementia. This has enabled discriminatory practices such as segregation and confinement to residential long-term care settings that are sorely understaffed and lack a supportive, relational, and enriching environment. With a sense of moral urgency to address this crisis, we forged alliances across the globe to form Reimagining Dementia: A Creative Coalition for Justice. We are committed to shifting the culture of dementia care from centralized control, safety, isolation, and punitive interventions to a culture of inclusion, creativity, justice, and respect. Drawing on the emancipatory power of the imagination with the arts (e.g., theatre, improvisation, music), and grounded in authentic partnerships with persons living with dementia, we aim to advance this culture shift through education, advocacy, and innovation at every level of society.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/tendências , Demência/epidemiologia , Demência/terapia , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , COVID-19/psicologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Demência/psicologia , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/tendências , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Casas de Saúde/tendências
9.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi ; 68(3): 195-203, 2021 Mar 30.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33504726

RESUMO

Objectives The purpose of this study was to identify the changes in trends of leading diseases that require long-term care within a 5-year period in an area with a rapidly growing aging population.Methods Data were obtained from newly registered primary insured individuals for long-term care insurance in Sapporo Minami Ward. There were 2,538 participants in FY2018 and 4,089 in FY2013 and FY2014. Disorders diagnosed by a primary doctor were categorized into groups using a long-term care questionnaire survey from the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions. The difference in the frequency of diseases between the survey years was examined using a chi-square test.Results In men, there was no significant change in the frequency of diseases that require long-term care within the 5-year period. In women, the frequency of cerebrovascular diseases significantly reduced (7.8% for FY2013 and 2014 vs. 5.6% for FY2018; P=0.008) and fractures and falls significantly increased (9.5% vs. 13.8%; P=0.001). Regarding the diseases in the severe-level category of long-term care insurance, malignancy was the most frequent disorder in men, followed by stroke. In women, the frequency of fractures and falls increased (10.5% vs. 17.7%; P=0.002) and subsequently became the most frequently occurring disorder. Similarly, the frequency of fractures and falls increased significantly (9.2% vs. 12.5%; P=0.004) in the mild-level long-term care insurance category.Conclusion For women, fractures and falls increased within the 5-year period, indicating the need to introduce a prompt preventive program. Lifestyle-related diseases such as malignancy and cerebrovascular diseases have become the main reason for shortening a healthy lifespan. This finding highlights the importance of preventing lifestyle-related diseases.


Assuntos
Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Assistência de Longa Duração/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Estilo de Vida Saudável , Humanos , Expectativa de Vida , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
10.
Epilepsy Behav ; 115: 107602, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279440

RESUMO

In this cohort study, we aim to compare outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in people with severe epilepsy and other co-morbidities living in long-term care facilities which all implemented early preventative measures, but different levels of surveillance. During 25-week observation period (16 March-6 September 2020), we included 404 residents (118 children), and 1643 caregivers. We compare strategies for infection prevention, control, and containment, and related outcomes, across four UK long-term care facilities. Strategies included early on-site enhancement of preventative and infection control measures, early identification and isolation of symptomatic cases, contact tracing, mass surveillance of asymptomatic cases and contacts. We measured infection rate among vulnerable people living in the facilities and their caregivers, with asymptomatic and symptomatic cases, including fatality rate. We report 38 individuals (17 residents) who tested severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive, with outbreaks amongst residents in two facilities. At Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy (CCE), 10/98 residents tested positive: two symptomatic (one died), eight asymptomatic on weekly enhanced surveillance; 2/275 caregivers tested positive: one symptomatic, one asymptomatic. At St Elizabeth's (STE), 7/146 residents tested positive: four symptomatic (one died), one positive during hospital admission for symptoms unrelated to COVID-19, two asymptomatic on one-off testing of all 146 residents; 106/601 symptomatic caregivers were tested, 13 positive. In addition, during two cycles of systematically testing all asymptomatic carers, four tested positive. At The Meath (TM), 8/80 residents were symptomatic but none tested; 26/250 caregivers were tested, two positive. At Young Epilepsy (YE), 8/80 children were tested, all negative; 22/517 caregivers were tested, one positive. Infection outbreaks in long-term care facilities for vulnerable people with epilepsy can be quickly contained, but only if asymptomatic individuals are identified through enhanced surveillance at resident and caregiver level. We observed a low rate of morbidity and mortality, which confirmed that preventative measures with isolation of suspected and confirmed COVID-19 residents can reduce resident-to-resident and resident-to-caregiver transmission. Children and young adults appear to have lower infection rates. Even in people with epilepsy and multiple co-morbidities, we observed a high percentage of asymptomatic people suggesting that epilepsy-related factors (anti-seizure medications and seizures) do not necessarily lead to poor outcomes.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Controle de Infecções/tendências , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Instituições Residenciais/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Epilepsia/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
11.
Chest ; 159(5): 1894-1901, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33309523

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented novel challenges for the entire health-care continuum, requiring transformative changes to hospital and post-acute care, including clinical, administrative, and physical modifications to current standards of operations. Innovative use and adaptation of long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs) can safely and effectively care for patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A framework for the rapid changes, including increasing collaboration with external health-care organizations, creating new methods for enhanced communication, and modifying processes focused on patient safety and clinical outcomes, is described for a network of 94 LTACHs. When managed and modified correctly, LTACHs can play a vital role in managing the national health-care pandemic crisis.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Assistência de Longa Duração , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Duração da Terapia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/tendências , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Assistência de Longa Duração/organização & administração , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Inovação Organizacional , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Front Immunol ; 11: 577853, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33193375

RESUMO

Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is T cell development disorders in the immune system and can be detected at birth. As of December 2018, all 53 newborn screening (NBS) programs within the United States and associated territories offer universal screening for SCID. The Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL), along with the Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF), surveyed public health NBS system laboratory and follow-up coordinators regarding their NBS program's screening methodologies and targets, protocols for stakeholder notifications, and long-term follow-up practices. This report explores the variation that exists across NBS practices, revealing needs for efficiencies and educational resources across the NBS system to ensure the best outcomes for newborns.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/tendências , Comunicação , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Triagem Neonatal/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/diagnóstico , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/terapia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Melhoria de Qualidade/tendências , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/epidemiologia , Participação dos Interessados , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
13.
BMC Palliat Care ; 19(1): 179, 2020 Nov 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33243203

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Despite known benefits, advance care planning (ACP) is rarely a component of usual practice in long-term care (LTC). A series of tools and workbooks have been developed to support ACP uptake amongst the generable population. Yet, their potential for improving ACP uptake in LTC has yet to be examined. This study explored if available ACP tools are acceptable for use in LTC by (a) eliciting staff views on the content and format that would support ACP tool usability in LTC (b) examining if publicly available ACP tools include content identified as relevant by LTC home staff. Ultimately this study aimed to identify the potential for existing ACP tools to improve ACP engagement in LTC. METHODS: A combination of focus group deliberations with LTC home staff (N = 32) and content analysis of publicly available ACP tools (N = 32) were used to meet the study aims. RESULTS: Focus group deliberations suggested that publicly available ACP tools may be acceptable for use in LTC if the tools include psychosocial elements and paper-based versions exist. Content analysis of available paper-based tools revealed that only a handful of ACP tools (32/611, 5%) include psychosocial content, with most encouraging psychosocially-oriented reflections (30/32, 84%), and far fewer providing direction around other elements of ACP such as communicating psychosocial preferences (14/32, 44%) or transforming preferences into a documented plan (7/32, 22%). CONCLUSIONS: ACP tools that include psychosocial content may improve ACP uptake in LTC because they elicit future care issues considered pertinent and can be supported by a range of clinical and non-clinical staff. To increase usability and engagement ACP tools may require infusion of scenarios pertinent to frail older persons, and a better balance between psychosocial content that elicits reflections and psychosocial content that supports communication.


Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados/normas , Tomada de Decisões , Assistência de Longa Duração/normas , Casas de Saúde/tendências , Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados/tendências , Grupos Focais/métodos , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Incerteza
15.
Z Gerontol Geriatr ; 53(8): 788-795, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33113017

RESUMO

The SARS-CoV­2 virus and the associated disease COVID-19 pose major challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Especially the vulnerable group of people in need of long-term care is at risk of suffering a severe course of the disease or of dying from the infection.In a nationwide cross-sectional study the situation and needs of inpatient and outpatient long-term care facilities during the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic were assessed and analyzed using an online survey.Participants from 531 institutions postulated the need for uniform recommendations for action on SARS-CoV­2, adequate and affordable protective and hygiene materials, serial tests in the institutions, well-founded advice on the implementation of interventions, a specific pandemic plan and supporting public relations work by the media. This calls for higher nursing remuneration, better staffing levels and greater appreciation of the nursing profession.In order to protect the vulnerable group of people in need of nursing care from a SARS-CoV­2 infection, long-term care must be given a stronger focus in health policy measures during the pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Enfermagem/tendências , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Pandemias
16.
Sr Care Pharm ; 35(11): 494, 2020 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33121572

RESUMO

The spread of COVID-19 may change the long-term care industry in ways that will last long after the pandemic has ended, and the diligent pharmacist needs to be aware of how to adjust to those changes.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Pandemias , Assistência Farmacêutica/tendências , Pneumonia Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 28(12): 1299-1307, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33004262

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Family visits with residents at long-term care (LTC) facilities have been restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective was to examine what communication methods, other than in-person visits, during the pandemic were associated with greater positive and lower negative emotional experiences for LTC residents and their family members and friends. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Nationally targeted online survey. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-one community-dwelling adults who had a family member or friend in a LTC facility. MEASUREMENTS: The Positive and Negative Affect Scale was used to assess participant's own emotions and perceived resident emotions during the pandemic. Questions were asked about nine communication methods other than physical visits (e.g., phone, video-conference, e-mail, and letters) in terms of frequency of use during the pandemic. Sociodemographics, resident health, and facility factors were assessed and used as covariates where indicated. RESULTS: During the pandemic, greater phone frequency was associated with less participant negative emotions (ß = -0.17). Greater e-mail frequency was associated with more perceived resident positive emotions (ß = 0.28). Greater frequency of letters delivered by staff was associated with more participant negative emotions (ß = 0.23). Greater frequency of letters delivered by staff and the postal service were associated with more perceived resident negative emotions (ß = 0.28; ß = 0.34, respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of synchronous, familiar methods of communication like the phone and email between families and LTC residents to maintain their emotional well-being when in-person visits are restricted.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Comunicação , Infecções por Coronavirus , Família/psicologia , Assistência de Longa Duração , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/psicologia , Demência/psicologia , Inteligência Emocional , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Relações Interpessoais , Assistência de Longa Duração/organização & administração , Assistência de Longa Duração/psicologia , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Masculino , Inovação Organizacional , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/psicologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Visitas a Pacientes/psicologia
18.
Ig Sanita Pubbl ; 76(1): 9-18, 2020.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32668446

RESUMO

ClinicFolder is a multilingual web application that facilitates communication and follow-up between health workers and assisted through Tele assistance, video consultation, and sending e-mails. Allows home surveillance thanks to the integration of special low-cost self-analysis medical devices to maximize the prevention and effectiveness of clinical intervention in Long Term Care. A system that, applied on a large scale, will contribute to the reduction of hospital admissions and medical expenses, improving the quality of life of its users, allowing assisted patients, doctors and participating health structures to collect and organize in a guided, simple and inviolable way, thanks to the use of advanced cryptography systems, the citizen's clinical history: from the physiological, family, work history to all specialist examinations, from diagnostic reports to the periodic check of vital parameters (pressure, temperature, heart rate, saturation ), blood sugar, cholesterol, triglycerides, with automatic calculation of the cardiovascular risk factor index and BMI, etc. also with graphic display of the data and with the possibility of integrating medical devices for the automatic acquisition of the parameters and for monitoring the patient in his own environment.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Assistência de Longa Duração/organização & administração , Qualidade de Vida , Telemedicina , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências
19.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 20(7): 715-719, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32634849

RESUMO

AIM: To clarify the association of cluster number and size of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in long-term care (LTC) hospitals/facilities, general medical/welfare facilities and non-medical/welfare facilities with morbidity and mortality in 47 prefectures during 16 January to 9 May 2020 in Japan. METHODS: Information on COVID-19 clusters (n ≥2), and morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 was collected. RESULTS: A total of 381 clusters with 3786 infected cases were collected, accounting for 23.9% of 15 852 cumulated cases on 9 May 2020. Although the cluster number (/107 subjects) in LTC hospitals/facilities was significantly smaller compared with those in the other two groups, the cluster size in LTC hospitals/facilities was significantly larger than that in non-medical/welfare facilities. Cluster numbers in general medical/welfare facilities and in non-medical/welfare facilities were significantly positively correlated with morbidity (/105 ), indicating relatively early identification of clusters in these facilities. Unlike in these facilities, cluster size in LTC hospitals/facilities was significantly positively correlated with morbidity, indicating that clusters in LTC hospitals/facilities were finally identified after already having grown to a large size in areas where infection was prevalent. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both cluster number and cluster size only in LTC hospitals/facilities were independently associated with higher mortality (≥median 0.64/105 subjects) after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive efforts against COVID-19 outbreaks even at the early phase of the epidemic are critically important in LTC hospitals/facilities, as both the larger number and size of clusters only in LTC hospitals/facilities were independently linked to higher mortality in prefectures in Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 715-719.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Hospitais de Doenças Crônicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , COVID-19 , Análise por Conglomerados , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Japão/epidemiologia , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Assistência de Longa Duração/organização & administração , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Masculino , Mortalidade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2
20.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(7): e2015957, 2020 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32697325

RESUMO

Importance: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been particularly severe among individuals residing in long-term care (LTC) facilities. As of April 10, 2020, half of Canada's COVID-19 deaths had occurred in LTC facilities. Objective: To better understand trends and risk factors associated with COVID-19 death in LTC facilities in Ontario, Canada. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of 627 LTC facilities included 269 total individuals who died of COVID-19 in Ontario to April 11, 2020, and 83 individuals who died of COVID-19 in Ontario LTC facilities to April 7, 2020. Because population denominators were not available for LTC residents, they were approximated as the total number of LTC facility beds in Ontario (79 498), assuming complete occupancy. Exposures: Confirmed or suspected COVID-19 outbreaks; confirmed COVID-19 infection among residents and staff, diagnosed by real-time polymerase chain reaction testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: COVID-19-specific mortality incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for LTC residents were calculated with community-living Ontarians older than 69 years as the comparator group. Count-based regression methods were used to model temporal trends and to identify associations of infection risk among staff and residents with subsequent LTC resident death. Model-derived IRRs for COVID-19-specific mortality were generated through bootstrap resampling (1000 replicates) to generate median and 95% credible intervals for IRR over time. Results: Of 627 LTC facilities, 272 (43.4%) reported COVID-19 infection in residents or staff. Of 1 731 315 total individuals older than 69 years living in Ontario during the study period, 229 (<0.1%) died; of 79 498 potential residents in LTC facilities, 83 (0.1%) died. The IRR for COVID-19-related death in LTC residents was 13.1 (95% CI, 9.9-17.3) compared with community-living adults older than 69 years. The IRR increased sharply over time and was 87.3 (95% credible interval, 6.4-769.8) by April 11, 2020. Infection among LTC staff was associated with death among residents with a 6-day lag (eg, adjusted IRR for death per infected staff member, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.26). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of COVID-19-related deaths during the pandemic in Ontario, Canada, mortality risk was concentrated in LTC residents and increased during a short period. Early identification of risk requires a focus on testing, providing personal protective equipment to staff, and restructuring the LTC workforce to prevent the movement of COVID-19 between facilities.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Assistência de Longa Duração/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração/tendências , Ontário/epidemiologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...